CHARACTERIZATION OF BODY GONIOMETRY OF WOMEN OF THE FIRST PERIOD OF ADULTHOOD WITH DIFFERENT BODY TYPES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24195/olympicus/2024-3.19Keywords:
mature age, women, body composition, posture, goniometric characteristicsAbstract
The relevance of the problem. In an era of dramatic social change and transformation, women's health is a strategic resource for Ukrainian society. The spatial organization of the body should be defined as an external form of manifestation of the morphological and functional unity of the human body organization. The goniometric indicators of the body serve as a basis for assessing the purposefulness of pedagogical influences in the organization of the process of health fitness of women aged 23–26 years with different somatotypes involved in the study. The purpose of the study – to determine the features of body goniometry of women aged 23–26 years with different somatotypes. Research methods: analysis of literary sources, anthropometry, pedagogical experiment, photography and analysis of the biogeometric profile of women's posture, methods of mathematical statistics. Results of the study. The study found that 26.7% of the subjects had an asthenic body type, 28.9% had a picnic type, and 44.4% had a normosthenic type. The study examined the peculiarities of the spatial organization of the body of women aged 23–26 years with different somatotypes, in particular, the angular characteristics of the body. It was found that in women with an asthenic body type, the angle α1 (between the vertical line and the line connecting the spinous process of vertebrae СVII and the center of mass (CM) of the head) is slightly smaller than in subjects with other body types, and even by the average value, it is less than normal (from 30.26° to 31.5°), indicating a lower forward head tilt. Average angle value α2 (between the horizontal line and the line connecting the highest point of the frontal bone and the chin protrusion) are within the normal range (from 89° to 90.2°) and it is also the smallest compared to the average values in other typological groups. However, the mean value of the angle α3 ((between the vertical line and the line connecting the spinous processes of vertebrae VII and LV) is the highest in them, which is significant because this angle in them exceeds the upper limits of the norm (from 1.5° to 2.6°). Women with normosthenic and picnic body types have similar average values for the angles α1 and α2 , which are within the normative values. However, the angle α3 in women of picnic body type is slightly smaller, which may indicate a more correct posture of these women. In order to better understand the differences in posture between women with different body types, we turn to a detailed analysis of individual data, presenting possible deviations from the norm in percentage terms. Conclusions. Characterizing the body goniometry of the studied contingent of women aged 23–26 years, we first of all note the absence of significant differences in it in persons with different body types. The majority of them, regardless of body type, had normal head and neck position (at the angle of α1– 75,6% 75.6% of all women examined, at the angle of α2 – 91,1%), and the angle of torso inclination was higher than normal in all of them.
References
Асаулюк І. О., Козловська С. О. Вікові особливості фізичного розвитку жінок зрілого віку з різним станом опорно-рухового апарату. Фізична культура, спорт та здоров’я нації. 2023. № 16 (35). С.14–22. https://doi.org/10.31652/2071-5285-2023-15(34)-394-405.
Асаулюк І., Носова Н., Демьохін Д., Покропивний О., Маринчук П. Стан біомеханіки постави, як критерій диференціації занять в процесі фізкультурно-спортивної реабілітації. Фізична культура, спорт та здоров’я нації. 2023. № 15 (34). С. 406–420. https://doi.org/10.31652/2071-5285-2023-15(34)-406-420.
Асаулюк, І. О., Демьохін, Д. Ю. Індивідуальні SMART цілі – обов’язкова компонента процесу фізкультурно-спортивної реабілітації жінок з порушеннями біогеометричного профілю постави. Фізична культура, спорт та здоров'я нації. 2023. №(16). С. 127–134. https://doi.org/10.31652/2071-5285-2023-16(35)-127-134.
Демьохін Д., Асаулюк І. Стан біомеханіки постави та особливості соматометричних показників жінок другого періоду зрілого віку Спортивний вісник Придніпров’я. 2024. № 1. С. 34–42. https://doi.org/10.32540/2071-1476-2024-1-034.
Кашуба В.О., Лопацький С.В. Теоретико-практичні аспекти моніторингу просторової організації тіла людини. Івано-Франківськ: Видавець Кушнир Г. М.; 2018. 232 с.
Кашуба В., Гончарова Н., Ткачова А., Прилуцька Т. Особливості тілобудови жінок першого періоду зрілого віку, які займаються аквафітнесом. Спортивний вісник Придніпров’я. 2019. № 1. С. 97–104.
Козловська С. О., Асаулюк І. О. Суб'єктивна оцінка стану опорно-рухового апарату, особливості уподобань, мотивів до фізкультурно-оздоровчих занять жінок другого періоду зрілого віку. OLYMPICUS. 2023. №. 3. С. 89–98. https://doi.org/10.24195/olympicus/2023-3.14.
Корекція тілобудови людини в процесі занять фізичними вправами: теоретичні та практичні аспекти [Текст] : кол. моногр. / за наук. ред. А. І. Альошиної, І. П. Випасняка, В. О. Кашуби. Луцьк : Вежа-Друк, 2022. 536 с.
Стопа М. Особливості просторової організації тіла жінок 23–26 років. Фізична культура, спорт та здоров’я нації. 2024. № 17 (36). С. 406–420. https://doi.org/10.31652/2071-5285-2023-15(34)-406-420.
Hakman A., Andrieieva O., Kashuba V., Nakonechnyi I., Cherednichenko S., Khrypko I., Tomilina Yu., Filak F. Characteristics of Biogeometric Profile of Posture and Quality of Life of Students During the Process of Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2020. 20(1). P. 79–85. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.01010.
Kashuba V., Rudenko Y., Khabynets T., Nosova N. Use of correctional technologies in the process of health-recreational fitness training by men with impaired biogeometric profile of posture. Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport. 2020. 6(4), p. 45–55. elSSN 2450-6605. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/PPS.2020.06.04.005.
Kashuba V., Stepanenko O., Byshevets N., Kharchuk O., Savliuk S., Bukhovets B., Grygus I., Napierała M., Skaliy T., Hagner-Derengowska M., Zukow W. Formation of Human Movement and Sports Skills in Processing Sports-pedagogical and Biomedical Data in Masters of Sports. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 2020. 8(5). P. 249–257. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2020.080513.
Kashuba V., Khmelnitska I., Andrieieva O., et al. Biogeometric Profile of the Posture as a Factor of Men’s Functional Assessment of Movements in the Early Middle Age. Sport Mont. 2021. 19(2). P. 35–39.
Lazko O., Byshevets N., Plyeshakova O., Lazakovych Yu., Kashuba V., Grygus I., Volchinskiy A., Smal J., Yarmolinsky L. Determinants of office syndrome among women of working age. Journal of Physical Education and Sport ® (JPES), 2021. Vol 21 (Suppl. issue 5), Art 376 pp 2827 – 2834, Oct 2021 online ISSN: 2247 – 806X; p-ISSN: 2247 – 8051; ISSN – L = 2247 – 8051 © JPES. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.s5376.
Lazko O., Byshevets N., Kashuba V., Lazakovych Yu., Grygus I., Andreieva N., Skalski D. Prerequisites for the Development of Preventive Measures Against Office Syndrome Among Women of Working Age. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ. 2021. 21(3). P. 227–234. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2021.3.06 ISSN 1993-7989 (print). ISSN 1993-7997 (online). ISSN-L 1993-7989.
Tkachova A., Dutchak M., Kashuba V., Goncharova N., Lytvynenko Y., Vako I., Kolos S., Lopatskyi S. Practical implementation of differentiated approach to developing water aerobics classes for early adulthood women with different types of body build. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES). 2020. 20 (S. 1). P. 456–460.